LogFAQs > #962031220

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicNFL Divisional Round Discussion Topic Part 2
plasmabeam
01/24/22 9:44:45 AM
#196:


FFDragon posted...
I agree, usually, but we also got that great Tebow crushing the Steelers moment which always makes me happy remembering

Hahahah classic.

Seanchan posted...
And how is that any better than: Bills get a chance to match, trot down the field and score. Chiefs get the ball back in TRUE SUDDEN DEATH, trot down the field again and score? I mean, the 2nd time they would only need a FG to win it, right?

At a certain point, the people asking for both teams to possess would cause the game to inevitably evolve into the college OT rules. And that includes the no kickoffs and shortened fields because the strain on the players bodies would be too much.

Bills/Chiefs with college OT rules would've been electrifying at the rate both QBs were playing. Not saying college OT rules are the answer, but imagine that duel going back and forth on short fields.

If they change the NFL OT rules, I'm for "each team possesses the ball at least once." Both offenses and defenses should see the field regardless of whether a TD is scored.

I've said it once and I'll say it again. If you can't play D, you don't deserve to win.

Chiefs didn't win because of their defense. C'mon now.

---
~Jacksonville Jaguars~
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1