LogFAQs > #962341434

...which imo should have been a ban, while Vegy did get banned for whatever he did?

Don't get me wrong, I think Vegy's gimmick is annoying and he's a pretty annoying user. He's posted some real creep shit. If he finally posted the last straw, that's fine.

But when another user calls a religious minority "it", calls them a disgrace to his species and says that several people of that religious minority he's met deserved multiple levels of genocide against them, and merely gets purged? I don't think the punishment is level.

You could argue that Vegy has been moderated more and that his ban is the logical conclusion of his total record of moderations, but despite his creep shit, I haven't seen him posting anything to the degree of inviting genocide against Jewish people. Kyoryu's post was targeted bigotry, and I don't think it's unfair to argue that the post was made to be as inflammatory as possible to get the biggest possible reaction - and yeah, I guess me making this topic plays into his trolling.

You can't tell me that his history of posting hasn't been inflammatory up to this point. Dude is a troll, and I get that some trolls slip through the cracks because shitposting and getting into arguments are engrained into CE's nature, but if we're arguing the context of this user's other posts, he probably shouldn't get a pass for those either.

I shit-talk users in their suspension threads, sure. I laugh when someone fucks up. I'm not above it all, and I'm not above watching someone get upset and melt down after being trolled. Still, I think KyoryuCyan's post crossed a line, and if nothing else I'd like to hear from the horse's mouth about why this particular action was taken. I think he should have been banned, but I'm open-minded enough to accept some sort of explanation that led to this result.

Seriously, anything. I'll take breadcrumbs at this point. I just want to understand what the thought process was.

@SBAllen