Post 3 speaks in terms of hardware instead of software, and also doesn't realize ownership isn't permission to make and especially profit from illegal variations.
Post 5 (hi Rev) for a laughably low figure, likely just meant to undermine the situation.
Post 6 thinks the crime here is simple resale.
Post 11's strawman doesn't realize illegal car mods exist.
Post 12 building off post 11 and somehow trying to pin it on Nintendo for making the console in the first place instead of the modder for intentional misuse and profiting from that misuse.
Post 14 is just dumb as bricks with the false equivalencies, and doesn't think laws should have nuance for the nature or intent of actions.
Post 19 for being Lokarin.
---
My friends call me Vee. I'm not your friend, buddy.