LogFAQs > #962491547

Fyi, I've read multiple articles about this story. Regardless, if the employer thought the bartender was responsible for robbery losses, he would have been terminated and charges would have been pressed. Instead they coerced him into an illegal contract literally hours after the robbery. This was blatantly illegal from the get-go as there was no reasonable basis to assume he was responsible, and they would have to provide that first in order for the contract to be valid. But hey, keep digging that hole and insisting this kind of repayment contract can be legal when it involves a robbery.