From: edwardsdv | #247
It being NASH is the problem though.
If it were like Brodus Clay or Even Zack freakign Ryder, or Sid Vicious, or Bret the Hitman Hart, or Dolph Ziggler, or Tyson Tomko, or REALLY anyone else that isnt named Kevin Nash, Scott Hall, Sean Waltman, or Shawn Michaels this whole situation would be different.
Kevin Nash: hired gun at his age looking as awful as he does is just bad bad bad and it carries all that potential Kliq crap back into focus where NO ONE wants it.
See I don't think it's going to be a big focus. If this were TNA? Yeah I'd be skeptical. I don't trust WWE for much these days but I do think they know better than to make a storyline become something about last decade's news. Yeah it makes it point to Triple H a bit more than normal-- but so what-- that's a good thing as it keeps people guessing. Cena not coming out to help (he was clearly mostly okay-- enough to do a run in-- given he was arguing with Triple H about the finish) is going to keep Cena in the picture. Well that and Cena being the loser.
Actually I think the foot under the ropes thing is the bigger problem than the Nash run in. I'd rather have Cena lost cleanly-- then this could even implicate Cena directly in that "he hired Nash to do damage because he can't beat Punk legit and wants ADR to have it cause he's an easier match." It could still imply that but it's a bigger stretch now.
--
No problem!
This is a cute and pop genocide of love!