LogFAQs > #53827

LurkerFAQs ( 06.29.2011-09.11.2012 ), Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicRuby, Sapphire, and Emerald were the best Pokemon games
HeroDelTiempo17
07/04/11 11:22:00 AM
#37:


From: MarvelousGerbil | #031
Say what? Who's hating on Suicune, Lugia, Forretress, Heracross, Tyranitar, Noctowl, and Ampharos. For having the lowest number of new Pokemon G/S did a fine job. People just have a bad impression of it because they don't like the starters and babies.


I like all of the ones you mentioned. Hell Ampharos is one of my favorites.

I didn't say there were NO good Pokemon. But the good ones weren't enough to make up for the awful filler Pokemon we got. Corsola, Stantler, Qwilfish, Snubbull, Sunkern/flora, Girafarig, Slugma, the babies...even the starters I don't really care about except for Cyndaqui. Meganium might be my least favorite fully evolved starter ever.

It's not really a case of GSC lacking good Pokemon, but there aren't enough, there's too many fillers, and the other gens have more good Pokemon overall. Even B/W's, which looked TERRIBLE at first, I warmed up to when I played the game.

and

From: Ryo8889 | #027
Metagross? Gulpin? awful


whaaaaaat

--
You have no time to ponder such questions, as Link has just grabbed a Smash Ball.
http://backloggery.com/herodeltiempo/sig.gif
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1