LogFAQs > #876880255

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicTrump's missile strike in Syria was a diversionary tactic
SkynyrdRocker
04/09/17 9:11:35 PM
#24:


streamofthesky posted...
The point was having a reason to go to war (in some form...bombing the shit out of a country is war, even if we put no boots on the ground and 99% of U.S. citizens go about their lives like nothing's different).
So he asked Congress to sanction military action, as the constitution requires. And they chickened out of being personally accountable for a possible war.

Obama couldn't win. If he follows the constitution, he's weak. If he had made strikes against Assad w/o Congressional approval, they'd have called him a dictator. No matter what he does, people like you would shout that he's wrong.

I think I'd have supported him acting in Syria. I don't know. We intervened in Iraq and it's a mess. We haven't intervened in Syria and it's a mess. The Middle East, man...
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1