LogFAQs > #878400434

EdgeMaster posted...

spanky1 posted...

Have legal "male abortions", where a man can sign a paper and remove all right to being a father, including child support requirements. This also means he can't ever see the kid.

This. If the father wants nothing to do with it and the mother wants to keep it, is against abortion, and wants the father to pay for it, they can meet in the middle. Mother keeps it, mother pays for it.

Solves the "I didn't know I shouldn't take antibiotics on birth control" and lying about birth control problem.

If DNA tests prove it's not the father's, he's off the hook financially, if he wanted to keep it. If the father is a deadbeat trying to run from responsibility, well, he probably won't find the time or have his priorities right to show up and sign the paperwork at the courthouse either lol.

In the situation that both parents want to keep it but their relationship isn't working out for whatever reason, both the mother and father put some amount of money into a bank account for the child. Neither parent can ever withdraw money from it, the child can use that money for whatever at 16-18 years old.

nope, child support is(intended) to benefit the child. You can't just sling dick all around town and deny your responsibility to those kids.

I'm not saying the system is perfect or always works in a "fair" way. But you don't get to be completely off the hook just because you don't want anything to do with the kid. you should have thought about that earlier.
---

"People incapable of guilt usually do have a good time"
-Detective Rust Cohle