In no way did I suggest that the father could just go around having unprotected sex without any repercussions.
yes, you did. But sure, hide behind "u mad" instead of defending your position or admitting you didn't state it correctly.
There's that bad reading comprehension again.
I think it's not right that a man can get roped into a shitty situation because a woman lied about being on birth control or got pregnant as an attempt to make him stay around.
Every situation is different, but if some low income/unemployed dead beat knocked someone up, there was no condoms used (especially if the woman wasn't on birth control), one or both parties were drunk, etc then signing the paperwork to release financial responsibility in addition to any rights to see the child wouldn't be an option. Tons of variables and I don't like to make blanket statements.
That's all he said she said bullshit that has no place in a courtroom. you said a man should be able to sign away all responsibility and rights to a child if he doesn't want it. What about that am I missing with my "bad reading comprehension" ---
"People incapable of guilt usually do have a good time" -Detective Rust Cohle