LogFAQs > #889101464

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Just a quick test. Only A or B answer.
mooreandrew58 10/25/17 6:37:38 AM #26:	KogaSteelfang posted... AllstarSniper32 posted... KogaSteelfang posted... I didn't vote at all, but I would save the kid. This is just designed to pull on the emotions of people you know are already emotional about situations like this. While also mocking those making the choice, as if one option discredits the other, when they realistically have nothing to do with each other. AllstarSniper32 posted... This question absolutely eviscerates their arguments, and their refusal to answer confirms that they know it to be true. Choosing to save the child, who is conscious of the situation, is feeling fear, and crying for help does not invalidate the belief that the embryos are alive and valuable themselves. pro abortion here. and I kind of have to agree, not that I find they have any value worth saving in a scenario like this. just the fact its unfair to say one thing doesn't matter at all when the other is clearly going to take priority to almost anyone. it would almost be like asking a person if they had to choose between saving their childs life or their pets life which would they choose. though thats a rougher decision imo.(still would go with the kid, but it would break my heart so much more than this supposed scenario) --- Cid- "looks like that overgrown lobster just got served!" Bartz-"with cheese biscuts AND mashed potatoes!" <cite>mooreandrew58 posted [p:889101464] in Just a qui... [t:75917340]...</cite> <quote><cite>KogaSteelfang posted...</cite> <quote><cite>AllstarSniper32 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KogaSteelfang posted...</cite> <quote>I didn't vote at all, but I would save the kid. This is just designed to pull on the emotions of people you know are already emotional about situations like this. While also mocking those making the choice, as if one option discredits the other, when they realistically have nothing to do with each other.</quote> <cite>AllstarSniper32 posted...</cite> <quote>This question absolutely eviscerates their arguments, and their refusal to answer confirms that they know it to be true.</quote></quote> Choosing to save the child, who is conscious of the situation, is feeling fear, and crying for help does not invalidate the belief that the embryos are alive and valuable themselves.</quote> pro abortion here. and I kind of have to agree, not that I find they have any value worth saving in a scenario like this. just the fact its unfair to say one thing doesn't matter at all when the other is clearly going to take priority to almost anyone. it would almost be like asking a person if they had to choose between saving their childs life or their pets life which would they choose. though thats a rougher decision imo.(still would go with the kid, but it would break my heart so much more than this supposed scenario) --- Cid- "looks like that overgrown lobster just got served!" Bartz-"with cheese biscuts AND mashed potatoes!"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1