A Voter ID law is all that it would take to change results dramatically...
If the costs are negligible, then surely you agree that voter ID laws should be designed in such a way that the government pays for and provides voter IDs to ALL its citizenry? Because liberals would have no problem with THAT. Their problem is that current voter ID laws either force poor people (moreso of non-white ethnicity) to pay more money in order to obtain one that they wouldn't use for any other purpose, or individual states can select WHICH forms of ID are acceptable, and choose the ones less likely to be held by democratic voters. As a liberal, I would LOVE a national voter ID law, because it would completely shoot to shit the whole "illegals are voting, voter fraud!" argument. But, the government needs to provide each and every citizen with an ID, rather than picking and choosing based on how to best manipulate the vote.
Hm, maybe. The principled position is that any meddling in the developer's work is bad. But if it was required for the ESRB rating, whatever.
It wasn't. Nintendo made the choice of their own accord. Which is exactly why you bitched and moaned about desexualizing a 13-year-old girl.
I'm sure you're happy you've ruined a good man's life. As you can see, nothing has been ruled by the courts, he just needs money to be able to defend himself at all. That's how globalists overwhelm good people - with money which they stole from us in the first place.
I haven't ruined ANYONE'S life. I'M not the one who molested underaged girls and needed to be banned from a mall for harassing underaged girls, like Roy Moore is. You said that the charges were a lie because they stopped being talked about after the election. I pointed out that he's still being sued by his victims for what he did. And you're right back to defending a pedophile, because you defend pedophilia.
"Instead"? The two go hand in hand.
Well, I mean, you're a foreigner on an American message board defending pedophilia, so I guess in THAT sense, they go hand in hand.
I refuted everything with ease, just like always. Gun-free zones are a clear invitation to shooters who know they will run unopposed there.
It wasn't a gun-free zone, there was a gun, and the shooter showed up and murdered 17 people anyway. Funny how that works out.
lmfao, way to show your extreme ignorance. The ONLY place where banning guns has "worked" is Japan - a HOMOGENOUS, HIGH-TRUST society. It's a recipe for disaster and has indeed been a disaster in any "multicultural", low-trust society it has been tried in. But don't take my word for it, here are the stats:
Australia. Way to say "here are the stats:" and not actually post anything, by the way.
