LogFAQs > #897722418

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Freedom, Liberty, Ron Paul - Reject the politics of healthy eating [dwmf]
Kenri 03/13/18 1:12:08 PM #110:	foolm0r0n posted... The movie was good though. It felt way more like a Bond movie than anything, mostly spy and tech stuff with very little in-suit action except for the obligatory paint-by-number final battle. The themes had about as much nuance as a Marvel movie can have, but it was still pretty interesting with hyper-isolationism vs hyper-interventionism. Nothing controversial or risky in there at all though. The follies of traditionalism/nationalism was shown, but also traditionalism had a big part in the victory, and all the good guys remained deeply nationalist. Also multiple good guys were strongly interventionist as individuals, including the American who was somehow a good guy despite doing literally only bad things the entire movie. It's honestly impressive how inoffensive they made the movie given how it's entirely about politics metroid composite posted... How does he do only bad things, though? If anything, it's almost a plot hole how goodie two shoes he is. These were my thoughts as well. After how much of the hype was centered around it being different from typical blockbusters, I was pretty disappointed by how inoffensive and moderate the whole thing was. It was a fun movie and all but yeah. --- Congrats to BKSheikah, who knows more about years than anyone else. <cite>Kenri posted [p:897722418] in Freedom, L... [t:76378306]...</cite> <quote><cite>foolm0r0n posted...</cite> <quote>The movie was good though. It felt way more like a Bond movie than anything, mostly spy and tech stuff with very little in-suit action except for the obligatory paint-by-number final battle. The themes had about as much nuance as a Marvel movie can have, but it was still pretty interesting with hyper-isolationism vs hyper-interventionism. Nothing controversial or risky in there at all though. The follies of traditionalism/nationalism was shown, but also traditionalism had a big part in the victory, and all the good guys remained deeply nationalist. Also multiple good guys were strongly interventionist as individuals, including the American who was somehow a good guy despite doing literally only bad things the entire movie. It's honestly impressive how inoffensive they made the movie given how it's entirely about politics</quote> <cite>metroid composite posted...</cite> <quote>How does he do only bad things, though? If anything, it's almost a plot hole how goodie two shoes he is.</quote> These were my thoughts as well. After how much of the hype was centered around it being different from typical blockbusters, I was pretty disappointed by how inoffensive and moderate the whole thing was. It was a fun movie and all but yeah. --- Congrats to BKSheikah, who knows more about years than anyone else.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1