LogFAQs > #898181275

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicFreedom, Liberty, Ron Paul - Reject the politics of healthy eating [dwmf]
foolm0r0n
03/20/18 8:27:18 PM
#249:


Legal punishment for that is obviously stupid, but what he's saying isn't okay just because it's a joke.

In fact, this obsession edgelords have with proving every shit thing they say is legally okay due to free speech is EXACTLY the mindset that leads to jailing people for saying things you disagree with. If they truly cared for free speech, they would be able to recognize that things they say are bad and should reasonably receive non-govt punishment. But they never do. They never admit that what they are saying deserves any punishment, especially not social and private costs, simply because they are legally allowed to say it.

The implication here is naturally that anything that they think is bad to say should be illegal, because it's all based on the same exact law-based morality that they use to justify their own speech via "free speech". This is why it's 100% unsurprising nor hypocritical that anti-sjws will instantly and unashamedly turn to government or other forms of force to shut down speech they deem unacceptable. Because saying that gamers es dum is obviously wrong and deserves punishment, unlike their epic nazi memes.

The law should never EVER be used to justify morality. Any libertarian with 1/4th of a brain realizes this.
---
_foolmo_
2 + 2 = 4
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1