LogFAQs > #898213845

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Politics Containment Topic 166: Three Trump Firings By 500 or Your Money Back
Suprak the Stud 03/21/18 11:23:22 AM #50:	Corrik posted... Suprak the Stud posted... https://washingtonmonthly.com/2018/03/21/no-obama-didnt-employ-the-same-strategies-as-cambridge-analytica/#.WrJK9WsY5bs.twitter Just because the current talking point I see exploding on Twitter is whatabout Obama! and its intellecially dishonest. While it is not the same, I disagree it is "intellecially" dishonest to point out that data has been used without the knowledge of users from both this and Obama's campaign. You have a literal person that worked at the lead of it stating how they did something similar and how that Facebook would not have allowed them to do so, but turned a blind eye because "they were on the same side". I do not think linking some person's opinion piece can change those facts. I meet your opinion piece with this one. https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/facebook-data-scandal-trump-election-obama-2012/ The fact is that there is a common denominator here. It is not Trump and Obama. It is Facebook. It is intellectually dishonest because what people are mad about isnt the fact CA used big data so to frame it that way is silly. Hey that guy asked to borrow your rake and you gave it to him so you cant be mad that I broke into your shed and stole it Also they arent even trying to excuse this behavior. Theyre just hoping to muddy the waters so people dont care. --- Moops? "I thought you were making up diseases? That's spontaneous dental hydroplosion." <cite>Suprak the Stud posted [p:898213845] in Politics C... [t:76435350]...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Suprak the Stud posted...</cite> <quote>https://washingtonmonthly.com/2018/03/21/no-obama-didnt-employ-the-same-strategies-as-cambridge-analytica/#.WrJK9WsY5bs.twitter Just because the current talking point I see exploding on Twitter is whatabout Obama! and its intellecially dishonest.</quote> While it is not the same, I disagree it is "intellecially" dishonest to point out that data has been used without the knowledge of users from both this and Obama's campaign. You have a literal person that worked at the lead of it stating how they did something similar and how that Facebook would not have allowed them to do so, but turned a blind eye because "they were on the same side". I do not think linking some person's opinion piece can change those facts. I meet your opinion piece with this one. https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/facebook-data-scandal-trump-election-obama-2012/ The fact is that there is a common denominator here. It is not Trump and Obama. It is Facebook.</quote> It is intellectually dishonest because what people are mad about isnt the fact CA used big data so to frame it that way is silly. Hey that guy asked to borrow your rake and you gave it to him so you cant be mad that I broke into your shed and stole it Also they arent even trying to excuse this behavior. Theyre just hoping to muddy the waters so people dont care. --- Moops? "I thought you were making up diseases? That's spontaneous dental hydroplosion."</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1