LogFAQs > #898292896

HHH is the game posted...

GiftedACIII posted...

You know what really bothers me about anti-abortionists? The argument that it can be "given for adoption". Hey, "pro-lifers" there are tens of thousands of children without parental figures right now. Go adopt some of them. Take the personal responsibility that your ideology endorses.
And what else is funny is that it's very likely these same people would consider single parents an immediate no for a relationship.

I don't see why the buden is on the pro-lifers not wanting a child to be killed, and not on the women that are having more babies they can't take care of?

Because you're the ones butting your nose where it doesn't belong and then refusing to follow up on it. A child that's being raised by parents who didn't want them might as well be put up for foster care or might be given to foster care due to child protection services.
Anti-abortionists don't actually care about children. They only care about making themselves feel better. If they supposedly care about all the children they're "saving" then they'd actually adopt some of them. But they don't and it's common knowledge the majority of them support economic ideals that screw them over even more.
Seriously, your logic isn't based on the welfare of children. It's based on spiting women. This is why people consider it a backward and regressive ideology.
---

</topic>