LogFAQs > #898293417

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicYou know what really bothers me about pro-choice people?
HHH is the game
03/22/18 3:30:06 PM
#115:


thronedfire2 posted...
HHH is the game posted...
GiftedACIII posted...
HHH is the game posted...
GiftedACIII posted...
You know what really bothers me about anti-abortionists? The argument that it can be "given for adoption". Hey, "pro-lifers" there are tens of thousands of children without parental figures right now. Go adopt some of them. Take the personal responsibility that your ideology endorses.
And what else is funny is that it's very likely these same people would consider single parents an immediate no for a relationship.


I don't see why the buden is on the pro-lifers not wanting a child to be killed, and not on the women that are having more babies they can't take care of?


Because you're the ones butting your nose where it doesn't belong and then refusing to follow up on it. A child that's being raised by parents who didn't want them might as well be put up for foster care or might be given to foster care due to child protection services.
Anti-abortionists don't actually care about children. They only care about making themselves feel better. If they supposedly care about all the children they're "saving" then they'd actually adopt some of them. But they don't and it's common knowledge the majority of them support economic ideals that screw them over even more.
Seriously, your logic isn't based on the welfare of children. It's based on spiting women. This is why people consider it a backward and regressive ideology.


No, the woman should not have had the baby in the first place. This is so ridiculous....you saying that we should just kill the baby instead of campaigning to stop people having babies they shouldn't be having in the first place. Nowhere in there do you blame the mother. The burden is on the people who don't want the baby to be killed and not on the people irresponsibly having babies?

It just seems like your argument is 'lets keep having babies and kill them all and all our problems will be solved' and you blame the people that are trying to stop the killing because you're like 'but we have a perfectly good solution to our problem! We just murder them! Why are you trying to stop us don't you realize we'll have the problem again?'

My stance is 'no you cannot kill your baby, please stop having them'. All of us could be doing more to help foster children but I don't see what puts you in the moral right here.


Why do you keep saying 'have the baby' when you clearly mean 'get pregnant'? You're trying to manipulate the way people see your stance. No one who gets an abortion is having a baby


Because the pro-choicers seem so determined to ignore the potential for this, perhaps because it makes them feel uncomfortable, I don't know. Yes you are right. The question of when a baby becomes a baby is a complicated one. Absolutely not something to joke about
---
Shelton undoubtedly wants Cena's championship belt. And Cena undoubtedly wants Shelton's black heritage.- looseiver
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1