LogFAQs > #898495494

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	NCAA Sweet 16 and beyond topic: Now 80% Cheaters free.
turbopuns2 03/25/18 11:06:39 PM #185:	Corrik, look. My first point was, effectively, "giving Knox the ball more would have netted us more points" Your response was to say PJ was the best player overall. That might be right, but it doesn't contradict my point. It is based on a bunch of stats that all either aren't relevant to our offense, or, would have looked different if you gave Knox the ball more. Corrik posted... 3 steals, 1 block irrelevant to my point. Getting steals and blocks in no way equates to "let's give him the ball on offense more." Corrik posted... 15 rebounds. (6 offensive) irrelevant to my point. rebounds in no way equates to "let's give him the ball on offense more." Corrik posted... Knox was 5-10. PJ was 5-7. again, I'm curious about 2nd half specifics. Corrik posted... Knox did shit on D. PJ played well on D. irrelevant to my point. defensive play in no way equates to "let's give him the ball on offense more." Corrik posted... Without PJ playing, UK would have been blown out while it's a fair statement, all things considered, it also does nothing to contradict my point. it would have been a blowout more because of what we lost from him on defense and to a lesser extent, drawing fouls. Corrik posted... Figuring Knox made a string of shots he is normally very inconsistent on, it is likely he would have been missing those shots moreso. And how many of those fouls on PJ were when he got an offensive rebound off a missed shot by Kentucky. You made a comment about us only doing well against Davidson because Knox was making shots he normally didn't. Not sure but you might have also made a similar comment during the Buffalo game. HMM coach, maybe Knox is working out here in this tournament... And for the bold part...again this in no way contradicts the point of "give Knox the ball more". I'm NOT saying Knox was the best player overall. I'm saying that he should have gotten the ball more. Those are very different statements. <cite>turbopuns2 posted [p:898495494] in NCAA Sweet... [t:76441389]...</cite> <quote>Corrik, look. My first point was, effectively, "giving Knox the ball more would have netted us more points" Your response was to say PJ was the best player overall. That might be right, but it doesn't contradict my point. It is based on a bunch of stats that all either aren't relevant to our offense, or, would have looked different if you gave Knox the ball more. <cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote>3 steals, 1 block</quote> irrelevant to my point. Getting steals and blocks in no way equates to "let's give him the ball on offense more." <cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote>15 rebounds. (6 offensive)</quote> irrelevant to my point. rebounds in no way equates to "let's give him the ball on offense more." <cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote>Knox was 5-10. PJ was 5-7.</quote> again, I'm curious about 2nd half specifics. <cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote>Knox did shit on D. PJ played well on D.</quote> irrelevant to my point. defensive play in no way equates to "let's give him the ball on offense more." <cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote>Without PJ playing, UK would have been blown out </quote> while it's a fair statement, all things considered, it also does nothing to contradict my point. it would have been a blowout more because of what we lost from him on defense and to a lesser extent, drawing fouls. <cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote>Figuring Knox made a string of shots he is normally very inconsistent on, it is likely he would have been missing those shots moreso. And how many of those fouls on PJ were when he got an offensive rebound off a missed shot by Kentucky. </quote> You made a comment about us only doing well against Davidson because Knox was making shots he normally didn't. Not sure but you might have also made a similar comment during the Buffalo game. HMM coach, maybe Knox is working out here in this tournament... And for the bold part...again this in no way contradicts the point of "give Knox the ball more". I'm NOT saying Knox was the best player overall. I'm saying that he should have gotten the ball more. Those are very different statements.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1