Lost_All_Senses posted... Because the majority is the majority...
Pleasing the majority (i'm talking about specific food habits here people) is far more important. Would you rather please 9 people and maybe frustrate 1? Or would you rather please that 1 person and potentially frustrate 9 people.
It's not good business nor efficient to cater to the minority (again not talking about race in case someone wants to take it that direction).
I would rather have 1 person feeling something was "unfair" then 9 people potentially feeling the same thing, it's both smarter and better for moral.
lmao what. you act like they were forcing everyone to become vegan or only vegan food allowed in the office from then on or something. it was one dinner. there is nothing in the vegan restaurant you can't eat.
Dustin1280 posted...
You seem to be ignoring the fact that vegan restaurants don't have options for non-vegan meals. And non-vegan restaurants DO have options for vegan meals.
Putting one person (or the minority) above EVERYONE else is a bad idea.
And for the record, I wouldn't care, I would eat whatever looks good at the vegan restauraunt.
That said I would question the logic of doing something that only caters to one type of person as opposed to picking something that has options for ALL types of people.
Dustin1280 posted...
Like I said, I don't have a problem with vegan food and would likely find something I would enjoy at a vegan restaurant (albeit, grudgingly).
Doesn't change the fact that going to a vegan restaurant caters ONLY to the vegan and ignores every other type of person and is a bad business choice.
While going to a non-vegan restaurant will ALMOST definitely have vegan options and picking one that doesn't would be equally stupid.
I'm looking at this from clearly a business standpoint, and the vegan only option is NOT optimal.
lmao option for a non vegan
a non-vegan can eat everything in a vegan restaurant ---