LogFAQs > #901709854

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicFire Emblem or Pokemon??
darkknight109
05/20/18 11:58:40 PM
#9:


GanglyKhan posted...
darkknight109 posted...
GanglyKhan posted...
Yowza, both the worst games in recent history for each series IMO.

Someone hasn't played Fire Emblem Fates...

Or Shadow Dragon, depending on how loose we're being with the term "recent history".

I really enjoyed Fates and found SoV to be intriguing since they did not go ahead with the modern systems for combat, which was a nice change of pace. Awakening's maps really killed the game for me. The second and third "arcs" of the game pick up in quality, but it doesn't make those first 13 chapters any more enjoyable.

And I am not counting SD, just the 3DS games for both series.

I don't know how you could like Birthright or Revelation over Awakening, since both of them basically *are* Awakening, but with shittier characters, a terrible story, and even less of a pretense of difficulty than Awakening had.

Conquest I could see, given that Conquest had far more interesting maps than Awakening did and is probably the most challenging English FE game since FE7, but even then you have to overlook an absolutely putrescent story.
---
Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster.
Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror!
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1