LogFAQs > #902371639

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicScarlet Ranks 150 User-Nominated Wrestlers Part II
scarletspeed7
06/01/18 12:42:32 PM
#65:


Yeah, great point about Miz. I'm also someone that thinks wrestlers should wrestle fewer matches on TV so as to feature a larger roster; we're past the age of traditional faces and heels, honestly. There are people who want every character to sit on the Iron Throne at the end of Game of Thrones. Feuds can last three months without a PPV match every match (so fuck off, Big Cass). I have no problem with three month breaks between Lesnar matches. Month 1 - Determine #1 contender. Month 2 - set up reason #1 contender dislikes Brock. Month 3 - blow-off. It's a perfectly fine system. It works well enough in MMA, and the character of Brock is an MMA character.

Or go the other way and have Brock's absence matter more in how the roster functions in general. Have someone win a #1 contendership, then have another worker on a win streak complain that they can't even get into the title picture since the guy with #1 contendership is going to be waiting 2 months. Then those guys can face off for the time being. Little things like that would only enhance the feeling that it's an larger roster and not just a series of unconnected segments building to a list of unrelated matches.
---
"Reading would be your friend." ~Dave Meltzer
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1