LogFAQs > #902623572

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Why is it expected in society that we praise someone who has or is having a kid?
Zeus 06/05/18 10:39:18 PM #32:	zebatov posted... If there were less people there would be less problems, and the ones we had would be less severe. And I'm quite honestly not sure how true that would be unless you eliminating specific groups rather than just reducing the overall population. zebatov posted... I understand why a country would need to continue to create new people, but we never should have let the populations grow so wildly out of control in the first place. ...first, it's generally not a conscious choice. Second, most aren't "wildly out of control." Third, a large population carries many benefits. zebatov posted... If we don't do something about the population, one day (sooner than you might think) we'll literally be shoulder-to-shoulder. It's actually nowhere near as likely as you think. As population increases, so does the ability to sustain a population (or it dies off) Doctor Foxx posted... wwinterj25 posted... Doctor Foxx posted... People need to scale back big time on what they're consuming just to support the population we have Well thanks to vegans and vegetarians there is more meat for the rest of us to consume so thanks! Can't eyeroll hard enough at that kind of attitude. Pretty much beyond selfish and shortsighted and into callous misanthropy. Gee, and to think people believe that vegetarians and vegans have holier-than-thou attitude =p --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:902623572] in Why is it ... [t:76675990]...</cite> <quote><cite>zebatov posted...</cite> <quote>If there were less people there would be less problems, and the ones we had would be less severe.</quote> And I'm quite honestly not sure how true that would be unless you eliminating specific groups rather than just reducing the overall population. <cite>zebatov posted...</cite> <quote>I understand why a country would need to continue to create new people, but we never should have let the populations grow so wildly out of control in the first place.</quote> ...first, it's generally not a conscious choice. Second, most aren't "wildly out of control." Third, a large population carries many benefits. <cite>zebatov posted...</cite> <quote>If we don't do something about the population, one day (sooner than you might think) we'll literally be shoulder-to-shoulder.</quote> It's actually nowhere near as likely as you think. As population increases, so does the ability to sustain a population (or it dies off) <cite>Doctor Foxx posted...</cite> <quote><cite>wwinterj25 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Doctor Foxx posted...</cite> <quote>People need to scale back big time on what they're consuming just to support the population we have</quote> Well thanks to vegans and vegetarians there is more meat for the rest of us to consume so thanks!</quote> Can't eyeroll hard enough at that kind of attitude. Pretty much beyond selfish and shortsighted and into callous misanthropy. </quote> Gee, and to think people believe that vegetarians and vegans have holier-than-thou attitude =p --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1