LogFAQs > #905348036

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Three different times this article lists being a White Male as a negative.
Corrik 07/19/18 9:40:10 AM #4:	KujikawaRising posted... I guess I'll just become a black female, then. ...oh wait. Seriously, so sick of this left-wing racism. People don't choose their race or sex. Stop labeling. In my mind, there's no such thing as "race" - we are all people and that's what's important. The problem is that if there is a serious negative connotation with being white in the Democratic party and the black support will only show up for a black candidate in numbers in which they can win an election, then it shows that the allegiance of black voters is to skin color predominantly and not to issues. It should literally not matter at all which color, race, gender, etc a candidate is. But three times that articles lists being white and male negatively. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:905348036] in Three diff... [t:76821599]...</cite> <quote><cite>KujikawaRising posted...</cite> <quote>I guess I'll just become a black female, then. ...oh wait. Seriously, so sick of this left-wing racism. People don't choose their race or sex. Stop labeling. In my mind, there's no such thing as "race" - we are all people and that's what's important.</quote> The problem is that if there is a serious negative connotation with being white in the Democratic party and the black support will only show up for a black candidate in numbers in which they can win an election, then it shows that the allegiance of black voters is to skin color predominantly and not to issues. It should literally not matter at all which color, race, gender, etc a candidate is. But three times that articles lists being white and male negatively. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1