LogFAQs > #905369154

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicThree different times this article lists being a White Male as a negative.
Corrik
07/19/18 4:36:29 PM
#83:


Seginustemple posted...
Isn't this article just arguing that "white male" is a negative concerning liberal voter demographics? It seems no different than suggesting that being a black woman is a negative if you were running as a republican (which is probably true)

It is insinuating that the Democratic party is positioned so that they will automatically vote more for a candidate that is not white over white and that trotting out a white male candidate automatically is a disadvantage just because of being white and male.

Hence, if Hillary Clinton was exactly the same but black that she would have gotten more votes from her party simply by being that race. And of Hillary Clinton was exactly the same but male, she would have gotten less votes.

It is an implied diatribe against the state of the Democratic party.

And it is stated as basically understood fact in this article and not even positioned as just a possibility.
---
LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1