LogFAQs > #905417948

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Who should be the Democrat candidate in 2020?
Zeus 07/20/18 12:39:35 PM #46:	BlackScythe0 posted... Kamala Harris seems like the establishment pick. Still quite a bit of time before the primaries really get underway so that could change. GRTooCool posted... The US is still behind the times so they're not ready for a female president. If anyone beside her ran against Trump, they would have won. Hillary's loss had little to do with her gender. ParanoidObsessive posted... The Democrats are being handed the greatest opportunity they've had in years to take the White House from the opposition without much of a struggle - IF they nominate the right candidate. But the last time they were in a position like this, they got complacent, nominated John Kerry, and wound up with "FOUR MORE YEARS". Well, it looked like it was an easy win against Trump the first time, too >_> Honestly, the country has a pretty strong tendency towards incumbency even after crappy first terms. That said, he might always decide not to go for re-election. After all, he's not a traditional politician and he is getting up there in the years. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:905417948] in Who should... [t:76823398]...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote>Kamala Harris seems like the establishment pick.</quote> Still quite a bit of time before the primaries really get underway so that could change. <cite>GRTooCool posted...</cite> <quote>The US is still behind the times so they're not ready for a female president. If anyone beside her ran against Trump, they would have won. </quote> Hillary's loss had little to do with her gender. <cite>ParanoidObsessive posted...</cite> <quote>The Democrats are being handed the greatest opportunity they've had in years to take the White House from the opposition without much of a struggle - IF they nominate the right candidate. But the last time they were in a position like this, they got complacent, nominated John Kerry, and wound up with "FOUR MORE YEARS".</quote> Well, it looked like it was an easy win against Trump the first time, too >_> Honestly, the country has a pretty strong tendency towards incumbency even after crappy first terms. That said, he might always decide not to go for re-election. After all, he's not a traditional politician and he is getting up there in the years. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1