LogFAQs > #905705086

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	My friend told a woman, "fuck her and her ugly ass children."
darkknight109 07/25/18 3:07:08 PM #193:	Kyuubi4269 posted... When neither have anything to support them, they're equally unproven. They are equally likely until further evidence is presented to support one or the other. Equally unproven, yes. Equally unlikely, no. I'm Superman. The comic books and movies are actually biopics of my life presented for the entertainment of the masses. There's my statement of claim. Based on the information available, you can neither prove nor disprove that I am Superman. The claim "I am Superman" and "I am not Superman" are both equally unproven, but they are very much not equally unlikely. Kyuubi4269 posted... The TC was there so his word carries weight. And, notably, he said nothing about the other family getting thrown out, even when talking about who WAS thrown out as part of this confrontation. Kyuubi4269 posted... However that claim is easily fact checked and ruled out immediately Said fact checking hasn't been done, so I'm afraid you'll still have to treat that claim as an equally valid possibility until you've gone out and interviewed the TC and the family in question to prove that they're still alive and weren't killed by ninja. Sorry. (You'd think something like that would be in the papers, but then again "absence of evidence" and all that...) Kyuubi4269 posted... Doing nothing isn't doing something, I can see how this is difficult for you. It's amazing how much I have to break this down, but fine. Saying "She didn't have to do anything" is saying that her actions were unconstrained by any requirements; following that up immediately with "She had to leave him alone" is suddenly putting a requirement on her. You're now saying she does have to do something, that something being "leave him alone and ignore him". That's not doing nothing. Kyuubi4269 posted... I made an apples for apples comparative example I could do for you, you failed to take the bet against your nonsense On the contrary, when you made your offer I told you to go ahead and swear at some kids if you thought that would help you. You never did (or if you did and got told off for it, you never posted as much) - if anyone bitched out, it was you. But go ahead, run this experiment a few times for us if you're really that desperate to prove yourself right in an internet argument. Keep in mind the hazards of small sample size, so I'll expect a statistically valid sampling if you want me to take you seriously on this. Kyuubi4269 posted... Schools aren't the real world lol So go in front of your boss's kids or a client's kids and swear at them. If you find yourself on a news show, start dropping F-bombs. Go to a fancy restaurant and start swearing loudly. In all of those cases, you'll pretty quickly be educated on what people think of crass language. There are situations where swearing is acceptable and situations where it isn't. In front of young kids is generally accepted as a situation where swearing is not acceptable, which is why kids movies do not have swears and footage aired for kids or in an environment where kids may be watching typically have the swears censored out. I mean, think about it for a second - if they're not bleeping those swears for kids, who do you think they're doing it for? Kyuubi4269 posted... "I disagree because I don't do it" lol So you don't know what a "style guide" is. Got it. --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! <cite>darkknight109 posted [p:905705086] in My friend ... [t:76821379]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote>When neither have anything to support them, they're equally unproven. They are equally likely until further evidence is presented to support one or the other.</quote> Equally unproven, yes. Equally unlikely, no. I'm Superman. The comic books and movies are actually biopics of my life presented for the entertainment of the masses. There's my statement of claim. Based on the information available, you can neither prove nor disprove that I am Superman. The claim "I am Superman" and "I am not Superman" are both equally unproven, but they are very much not equally unlikely. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote>The TC was there so his word carries weight.</quote> And, notably, he said nothing about the other family getting thrown out, even when talking about who WAS thrown out as part of this confrontation. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote>However that claim is easily fact checked and ruled out immediately</quote> Said fact checking hasn't been done, so I'm afraid you'll still have to treat that claim as an equally valid possibility until you've gone out and interviewed the TC and the family in question to prove that they're still alive and weren't killed by ninja. Sorry. (You'd think something like that would be in the papers, but then again "absence of evidence" and all that...) <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote>Doing nothing isn't doing something, I can see how this is difficult for you. </quote> It's amazing how much I have to break this down, but fine. Saying "She didn't have to do anything" is saying that her actions were unconstrained by any requirements; following that up immediately with "She had to leave him alone" is suddenly putting a requirement on her. You're now saying she does have to do something, that something being "leave him alone and ignore him". That's not doing nothing. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote>I made an apples for apples comparative example I could do for you, you failed to take the bet against your nonsense</quote> On the contrary, when you made your offer I told you to go ahead and swear at some kids if you thought that would help you. You never did (or if you did and got told off for it, you never posted as much) - if anyone bitched out, it was you. But go ahead, run this experiment a few times for us if you're really that desperate to prove yourself right in an internet argument. Keep in mind the hazards of small sample size, so I'll expect a statistically valid sampling if you want me to take you seriously on this. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote>Schools aren't the real world lol </quote> So go in front of your boss's kids or a client's kids and swear at them. If you find yourself on a news show, start dropping F-bombs. Go to a fancy restaurant and start swearing loudly. In all of those cases, you'll pretty quickly be educated on what people think of crass language. There are situations where swearing is acceptable and situations where it isn't. In front of young kids is generally accepted as a situation where swearing is not acceptable, which is why kids movies do not have swears and footage aired for kids or in an environment where kids may be watching typically have the swears censored out. I mean, think about it for a second - if they're not bleeping those swears for kids, who do you think they're doing it for? <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote>"I disagree because I don't do it" lol</quote> So you don't know what a "style guide" is. Got it. --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1