LogFAQs > #908040071

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Survivor/BB/TAR Summer Topic 3 - David and FOUTTE vs. a Goliath Level 6
mnkbear907 09/03/18 3:21:08 PM #70:	Xuxon posted... Inviso posted... mnkbear907 posted... I don't watch Survivor, I just think it's silly to argue that players should actively avoid making good smart decisions. Like do want a season of no one making any moves at all and everyone just picking straws to decide who to nominate and evict? Because that's what praising bitter juries will accomplish. (obvious hyperbole) I'm arguing that bitter juries will change the definition of "good, smart decisions". Ideal gameplay in ALL scenarios is to form an alliance and pacify all members of that alliance while eliminating outsiders. And that's boring as fuck. That gives you your Redemption Island, South Pacific, One World trifecta. If bitter juries change the gameplay so that "alienate the opposition and sweep them off the board entirely" becomes a bad option, then GOOD. Give us a China or Cagayan where, even if an alliance is dominating, they're still cool with picking off their own members on occasion. how do bitter juries prevent alliances sticking together and dominating? all that does is give even less wiggle room to work with the last 1 or 2 members of the opposing side, knowing that they'll definitely win if they make it. lol yeah, knowing about the bitter jury forming just gives L6 more incentive to get Haleigh/Scottie/Sam/JC out. --- Bear Love! https://imgur.com/PMeBR <cite>mnkbear907 posted [p:908040071] in Survivor/B... [t:76951723]...</cite> <quote><cite>Xuxon posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Inviso posted...</cite> <quote><cite>mnkbear907 posted...</cite> <quote>I don't watch Survivor, I just think it's silly to argue that players should actively avoid making good smart decisions. Like do want a season of no one making any moves at all and everyone just picking straws to decide who to nominate and evict? Because that's what praising bitter juries will accomplish. (obvious hyperbole)</quote> I'm arguing that bitter juries will change the definition of "good, smart decisions". Ideal gameplay in ALL scenarios is to form an alliance and pacify all members of that alliance while eliminating outsiders. And that's boring as fuck. That gives you your Redemption Island, South Pacific, One World trifecta. If bitter juries change the gameplay so that "alienate the opposition and sweep them off the board entirely" becomes a bad option, then GOOD. Give us a China or Cagayan where, even if an alliance is dominating, they're still cool with picking off their own members on occasion.</quote> how do bitter juries prevent alliances sticking together and dominating? all that does is give even less wiggle room to work with the last 1 or 2 members of the opposing side, knowing that they'll definitely win if they make it.</quote> lol yeah, knowing about the bitter jury forming just gives L6 more incentive to get Haleigh/Scottie/Sam/JC out. --- Bear Love! https://imgur.com/PMeBR</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1