LogFAQs > #908513902

GanglyKhan posted...

Also lmao'ing @ Zeus's awful outlook on Pokmon.
>no items
>no abilities
>removing the only other controlled part of team building besides roster/moves
>"yeah, this is acceptable"
>remove EV/IV bullshit
>"wtf I want my 7 hour RNG grind back"

lmao'ing @ your awful opinions on everything, little buddy

>no items at all or no held items? Because he only claimed held items
>I like abilities, but the real gen 1 didn't have abilities either and neither does PG. A game based on PG wouldn't have them.
>What?
>Not sure which part this was referencing
>Different doesn't necessarily mean bad. The 151 fits the theme, using at least one specific Pokemon is an interesting gimmick, and the other two things are how it works in PG which, for a game connected to PG, only makes sense that it'd be the same way.
>For a guy who whines about losing customization, I'm not sure why you'd push to remove EVs which GIVE customization. However, if it's based on PG, it probably won't have EVs, just IVs.
>Not sure what that's about, but whatever. Keep whining.

faramir77 posted...

SilentSeph posted...

Yeah I think I'm gonna pass on this one. Also, is the game really $80?

$80 CAD. Games got a price raise here a couple years back after being $60 for like 30 years.

Raising the prices?! Those cads!

I know that CAD vs USD is a bit different so the money doesn't really equate to the same thing (in fact, 80CAD works out to about 60USD), but it still seems like a crazy hike.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|
There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist.