LogFAQs > #909162431

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Making sexual harassment claims that are over 30 years old.
GreenKnight127 09/21/18 1:33:31 AM #47:	darkknight109 posted... GreenKnight127 posted... Women in today's society DO need to prove a rape/assault/harassment occurred. Does that concept blow your mind or something? How else would a woman expect law enforcement to magically find evidence against the man to result in a conviction unless she brings something forward beyond a verbal testimony? Because that's how things usually work? You don't walk into the police station and say "I was raped! Here's several swabs I took of myself, witness statements from my neighbours, security camera footage taken from the gas station down the street that shows the suspect leaving my house, and an itemized history of rapes in the neighbourhood to help zero in on the culprit." You walk in and say, "I was raped" and the cops take it from there. Except, in the real world, the cops can't always just magically "take it from there." Justice would come much more easily if there is evidence. They are going to ask the girl if she has any evidence to help with their investigation. If she has nothing to bring to the table, it is going to drag on forever, and ultimately lead in nothing happening. If she was dumb and decided to not take pictures of the bruises or marks....it's going to make things a LOT harder. If she waited too long to go to the police and the bruises or marks have faded.....the cops won't be able to take photos of the marks or bruises for their own investigation. If she didn't get any swabs done within a certain period of time, the DNA evidence won't be there, or it won't register properly to result in any kind of conviction. Women need to do themselves a favor by being proactive. It's not rocket science. If you want to interpret that as "victim-blaming" in some way, you are being dense. It's not victim-blaming to go out of your way to bring your attackers to fucking justice by doing a little legwork. Christ. --- ~Gamefaqs logic: Q: If it's so obviously a troll topic...why are you responding to it? A: "Because I have to tell them it's a troll topic!" facepalm <cite>GreenKnight127 posted [p:909162431] in Making sex... [t:77020198]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GreenKnight127 posted...</cite> <quote>Women in today's society DO need to prove a rape/assault/harassment occurred. Does that concept blow your mind or something? How else would a woman expect law enforcement to magically find evidence against the man to result in a conviction unless she brings something forward beyond a verbal testimony? </quote> Because that's how things usually work? You don't walk into the police station and say "I was raped! Here's several swabs I took of myself, witness statements from my neighbours, security camera footage taken from the gas station down the street that shows the suspect leaving my house, and an itemized history of rapes in the neighbourhood to help zero in on the culprit." You walk in and say, "I was raped" and the cops take it from there.</quote> Except, in the real world, the cops can't always just magically "take it from there." Justice would come much more easily if there is evidence. They are going to ask the girl if she has any evidence to help with their investigation. If she has nothing to bring to the table, it is going to drag on forever, and ultimately lead in nothing happening. If she was dumb and decided to not take pictures of the bruises or marks....it's going to make things a LOT harder. If she waited too long to go to the police and the bruises or marks have faded.....the cops won't be able to take photos of the marks or bruises for their own investigation. If she didn't get any swabs done within a certain period of time, the DNA evidence won't be there, or it won't register properly to result in any kind of conviction. Women need to do themselves a favor by being proactive. It's not rocket science. If you want to interpret that as "victim-blaming" in some way, you are being dense. It's not victim-blaming to go out of your way to bring your attackers to fucking justice by doing a little legwork. Christ. --- ~Gamefaqs logic: Q: If it's so obviously a troll topic...why are you responding to it? A: "Because I have to tell them it's a troll topic!" facepalm</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1