LogFAQs > #909447096

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicMaking sexual harassment claims that are over 30 years old.
GreenKnight127
09/25/18 8:44:32 PM
#134:


darkknight109 posted...
Revelation34 posted...
darkknight109 posted...
Alright, well, you're the one who believes in pink dragons, I guess...


You just don't understand how burden of proof works.

Sure I do. The guy who's claiming to be good enough to sit on the Supreme Court better be able to prove it.


Wow. You just don't get it darkknight109.

According to you, it's just a "job interview" so it's okay if he's seen as guilty by default.

And by needing to prove he is "good enough" to sit on the Supreme court, he needs to prove that he DIDN'T do something.

How can you NOT see how fucked up that is?

He can't prove a negative. His accuser and the investigative team needs to prove he did it first.

The timing of all this was clearly just a character smear. Plain as day.
---
~Gamefaqs logic: Q: If it's so obviously a troll topic...why are you responding to it? A: "Because I have to tell them it's a troll topic!" *facepalm*
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1