LogFAQs > #910028203

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Kavanaugh's rape of the 4th amendment....
BADoglick 10/05/18 7:23:02 PM #19:	SeahorseCpt89 posted... BADoglick posted... When the constitution was originally written, the idea of political parties was not supposed to exist within this country. Partisan politics have corrupted the supreme court. Instead of nominating justices who stand for liberty and constitutional rights, justices are mere pawns of the party who selects them, free to interpret the constitution as however they see fit to fulfill their agendas. Exactly. This is why I dont believe any president, or hell I dont believe any politician of EITHER party, should nominate a Supreme Court judge. Im not sure what the other option should be, probably either a third party or other judges, but there is almost a guarantee that the president is always going to choose a nominee that is biased towards one side or the other. They should just stay out of it. And thats why I dont want Kavinaugh in. Not because he may or may not have raped someone, but because I dont trust Trumps judgment that this man is qualified. Well the good news is that Trump didn't pick him. He was given the pick from a Republican think tank. The bad news is that means our president is a puppet who is doing literally the exact opposite of draining the swamp --- BADoglick to the Max! <cite>BADoglick posted [p:910028203] in Kavanaugh'... [t:77070502]...</cite> <quote><cite>SeahorseCpt89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BADoglick posted...</cite> <quote>When the constitution was originally written, the idea of political parties was not supposed to exist within this country. Partisan politics have corrupted the supreme court. Instead of nominating justices who stand for liberty and constitutional rights, justices are mere pawns of the party who selects them, free to interpret the constitution as however they see fit to fulfill their agendas.</quote> Exactly. This is why I dont believe any president, or hell I dont believe any politician of EITHER party, should nominate a Supreme Court judge. Im not sure what the other option should be, probably either a third party or other judges, but there is almost a guarantee that the president is always going to choose a nominee that is biased towards one side or the other. They should just stay out of it. And thats why I dont want Kavinaugh in. Not because he may or may not have raped someone, but because I dont trust Trumps judgment that this man is qualified.</quote> Well the good news is that Trump didn't pick him. He was given the pick from a Republican think tank. The bad news is that means our president is a puppet who is doing literally the exact opposite of draining the swamp --- BADoglick to the Max!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1