LogFAQs > #910029290

Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

BADoglick posted...

they couldn't challenge Kavanaugh on his belief that mass government surveillance is 'consistent with the 4th amendment'

1) I'm not in favor of mass government surveillance. People should have their privacy unless there's a substantiated reason to invade it.
2) I also don't see how it's violating the 4th amendment. In order for one's privacy to be violated there has to be a clear expectation of privacy.

The question comes down to what is protected by the 4th and is any of that what they are monitoring. What I see as the real issue is that people either aren't informed, or can't discern for themselves, as to what is private and what is public.
---

No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD.
Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB