LogFAQs > #910113911

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	The Best Board 8 Fantasy Football League 2018 Topic 2
turbopuns2 10/07/18 12:02:48 PM #139:	HanOfTheNekos posted... Now, I DO think we should reduce the time from 2 days, because that's a little long, but 24 hours feels a little short to allow for full review. See I just don't think there's much to think about when reviewing a trade. If it's grossly, obviously imbalanced, that's easy to spot right away, and if I look at a trade and think "wow I'm a little surprised he's accepting that" that's not a reason for me to want to veto it. It's just a poor trade, imo. So to me, it seems better to lean on the side of letting everyone have more time to find/agree on trades than to lean on the side of letting people have extra time to decide if they want to (be a jerk and) veto trades. And furthermore, can we just trust each other to be decent and not make shady lopsided trades? <cite>turbopuns2 posted [p:910113911] in The Best B... [t:77048369]...</cite> <quote><cite>HanOfTheNekos posted...</cite> <quote>Now, I DO think we should reduce the time from 2 days, because that's a little long, but 24 hours feels a little short to allow for full review.</quote> See I just don't think there's much to think about when reviewing a trade. If it's grossly, obviously imbalanced, that's easy to spot right away, and if I look at a trade and think "wow I'm a little surprised he's accepting that" that's not a reason for me to want to veto it. It's just a poor trade, imo. So to me, it seems better to lean on the side of letting everyone have more time to find/agree on trades than to lean on the side of letting people have extra time to decide if they want to (be a jerk and) veto trades. And furthermore, can we just trust each other to be decent and not make shady lopsided trades?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1