LogFAQs > #910190995

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Your thoughts on treatment of animals before going to the slaughterhouse?
InfestedAdam 10/08/18 6:12:00 PM #1:	Your thoughts on treatment of animals before going to the slaughterhouse? - Results (11 votes) Animals should be given comfortable living conditions and killed properly when meeting their Maker regardless of cost 45.45% (5 votes) 5 There should be a balance between how they're treated and cost of production 18.18% (2 votes) 2 Whichever yield the most/best product at the best price 18.18% (2 votes) 2 Don't care, they'll going into mah belly at some point 18.18% (2 votes) 2 Other 0% (0 votes) 0 I still eat meat and am not trying to dissuade others from doing so. After looking through the upcoming California propositions I'm surprised to see one related to animals. https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12,_Farm_Animal_Confinement_Initiative_(2018) To my understanding the definition of free range and other lingo related to the living conditions of animals might vary or be vague depending on who you ask. At a glance it seems this proposition is trying to narrow down how animals are treated but in my opinion stating that animals cannot be confined in a cruel manner might still be kinda vague. Personally I feel there could be a balance between how they're treated and the cost of production. I'm willing to stomach, no pun intended, the extra cost if it means Babe and friends are better treated before meeting their makers. Of course what that balance is might be beyond me. What are your thoughts on the treatment of animals before going to the slaughterhouse? Comments and opinions are appreciated, Thank you --- "You must gather your party before venturing forth" "Go for the eyes Boo! Go for the eyes!" <cite>InfestedAdam posted [p:910190995] in Your thoug... [t:77079865]...</cite> <quote> Your thoughts on treatment of animals before going to the slaughterhouse? - Results (11 votes) Animals should be given comfortable living conditions and killed properly when meeting their Maker regardless of cost 45.45% (5 votes) 5 There should be a balance between how they're treated and cost of production 18.18% (2 votes) 2 Whichever yield the most/best product at the best price 18.18% (2 votes) 2 Don't care, they'll going into mah belly at some point 18.18% (2 votes) 2 Other 0% (0 votes) 0 I still eat meat and am not trying to dissuade others from doing so. After looking through the upcoming California propositions I'm surprised to see one related to animals. https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_12,_Farm_Animal_Confinement_Initiative_(2018) To my understanding the definition of free range and other lingo related to the living conditions of animals might vary or be vague depending on who you ask. At a glance it seems this proposition is trying to narrow down how animals are treated but in my opinion stating that animals cannot be confined in a cruel manner might still be kinda vague. Personally I feel there could be a balance between how they're treated and the cost of production. I'm willing to stomach, no pun intended, the extra cost if it means Babe and friends are better treated before meeting their makers. Of course what that balance is might be beyond me. What are your thoughts on the treatment of animals before going to the slaughterhouse? Comments and opinions are appreciated, Thank you --- "You must gather your party before venturing forth" "Go for the eyes Boo! Go for the eyes!"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1