LogFAQs > #910525506

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Politics Containment Topic 200: Sayonara Nimrata
Jakyl25 10/14/18 5:31:33 PM #260:	Corrik posted... Jakyl25 posted... Its not so much our dependence on their oil. We have a LOT of oil, and our transition to alternative fuels is at least off the ground. We are more dependent on them to keep buying our weapons, IMO. And by we I mean military industrial lobbyists There is always someone to buy our shit. That doesn't matter much. Losing Saudi Arabia as a weapons buyer would be a huge loss to weapons manufacturers that couldnt be made up elsewhere. Yes they would still have plenty of buyers, but you know how businesses are. MAX PROFIT --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large <cite>Jakyl25 posted [p:910525506] in Politics C... [t:77088434]...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote>Its not so much our dependence on their oil. We have a LOT of oil, and our transition to alternative fuels is at least off the ground. We are more dependent on them to keep buying our weapons, IMO. And by we I mean military industrial lobbyists</quote> There is always someone to buy our shit. That doesn't matter much.</quote> Losing Saudi Arabia as a weapons buyer would be a huge loss to weapons manufacturers that couldnt be made up elsewhere. Yes they would still have plenty of buyers, but you know how businesses are. MAX PROFIT --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1