LogFAQs > #910963965

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Are Canadian divorce laws really this ass backwards?
Dampproof 10/22/18 1:44:57 PM #55:	Darklit_Minuet posted... Dampproof posted... This is all on Dave Foley. Firstly he agreed upon the amount. Instead of going to court and requesting a temporary reduction on the amount of Child Support owed due to losing his job. He simply just stopped paying altogether. Stupid. Unless you're dead you don't just stop a court appointed payment. Then later he wants the support amount owed to be reflective of his new income amount. But refuses to provide proof of exactly how much he makes to support his claims. Stop using this as "Marriage is the devil" because this guy did this to himself. Irrelevant, it shouldn't be close to the ridiculous amount it is. Drop a 0 from the end What do you mean Irrelevant? Its that high because he stopped paying and when he did it was no where near enough. They calculated the amount per month based upon his wages and he agreed to the amount in 2001. He was irresponsible in both instances by not adjusting the amount he owed per month due to understandable circumstances of a) losing job and b) lower income. Both instances he acted stupidly and could've saved himself a lot of trouble by cooperating with the court. How is the guy owing more than 500,000 because he made the decision to stop paying irrelevant? How is the guy not providing any sort of proof of his changed income allowing him the chance to lower his per month owed from the previous agreed upon amount irrelevant? Like. Do you even know what the word irrelevant means? --- "Cyberspace is - or can be - a good, friendly and egalitarian place to meet." - Douglas Adams <cite>Dampproof posted [p:910963965] in Are Canadi... [t:77112721]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dampproof posted...</cite> <quote>This is all on Dave Foley. Firstly he agreed upon the amount. Instead of going to court and requesting a temporary reduction on the amount of Child Support owed due to losing his job. He simply just stopped paying altogether. Stupid. Unless you're dead you don't just stop a court appointed payment. Then later he wants the support amount owed to be reflective of his new income amount. But refuses to provide proof of exactly how much he makes to support his claims. Stop using this as "Marriage is the devil" because this guy did this to himself.</quote> Irrelevant, it shouldn't be close to the ridiculous amount it is. Drop a 0 from the end</quote> What do you mean Irrelevant? Its that high because he stopped paying and when he did it was no where near enough. They calculated the amount per month based upon his wages and he agreed to the amount in 2001. He was irresponsible in both instances by not adjusting the amount he owed per month due to understandable circumstances of a) losing job and b) lower income. Both instances he acted stupidly and could've saved himself a lot of trouble by cooperating with the court. How is the guy owing more than 500,000 because he made the decision to stop paying irrelevant? How is the guy not providing any sort of proof of his changed income allowing him the chance to lower his per month owed from the previous agreed upon amount irrelevant? Like. Do you even know what the word irrelevant means? --- "Cyberspace is - or can be - a good, friendly and egalitarian place to meet." - Douglas Adams</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1