LogFAQs > #912550102

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	FO76 subreddit: "Just make New Vegas 2"
DarthAragorn 11/17/18 3:11:50 AM #3:	Dash_Harber posted... I'd rather see something new. New Vegas was great at the time, but Fallout doesn't really need direct sequels. It just wouldn't work. Like how none of the Elder Scrolls are direct sequels. Honestly, New Vegas hasn't aged great. What I'd really like to see is Fallout: Alaska. Think about it. A nuclear winter landscape, mutant polar bears, artifacts from the Chinese invasion everywhere. It's basically perfect for something 'new'. New Vegas 2 isn't necessary but a game in a different location that has the same (or greater since y'know games should improve over time) level of player choice, writing quality and RPG mechanics is --- A thousand eyes, and one. <cite>DarthAragorn posted [p:912550102] in FO76 subre... [t:77210279]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote>I'd rather see something new. New Vegas was great at the time, but Fallout doesn't really need direct sequels. It just wouldn't work. Like how none of the Elder Scrolls are direct sequels. Honestly, New Vegas hasn't aged great. What I'd really like to see is Fallout: Alaska. Think about it. A nuclear winter landscape, mutant polar bears, artifacts from the Chinese invasion everywhere. It's basically perfect for something 'new'.</quote> New Vegas 2 isn't necessary but a game in a different location that has the same (or greater since y'know games should improve over time) level of player choice, writing quality and RPG mechanics is --- A thousand eyes, and one.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1