LogFAQs > #912584314

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicFO76 subreddit: "Just make New Vegas 2"
Dash_Harber
11/17/18 7:45:31 PM
#14:


DarthAragorn posted...
New Vegas 2 isn't necessary but a game in a different location that has the same (or greater since y'know games should improve over time) level of player choice, writing quality and RPG mechanics is


Or, we could just take it to a new location and use those same systems, since it's, you know, part of the series.

pegusus123456 posted...
Literally Fallout 2.


Literally not a direct sequel. It takes place 80 years after the first one in a completely different location.

Freddie_Mercury posted...
dot dot dot


I'm not sure what is so hard to get here. Maybe I wasn't clear; sequels are fine, but we don't need to continue the story directly. Each game can take place in a completely different area in a different time period and it would be great. All that is required for a Fallout game is a post-apocalyptic America, but that covers a lot of different territory.

L0Z posted...

you want a mod of fallout 3s dlc? lol


No, Operation: Anchorage took place during the war. I want to see what happened to Alaska after the bombs dropped. My point is that the wildlife is diverse, the place would be full of war ruins, and it could provide something different from the deserts and melted cities that we've got so far.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1