LogFAQs > #912603915

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Nationalist politics topic 11: NPC meme is the gift that keeps on giving
Vlado 11/18/18 5:16:37 AM #395:	thekitchensink posted... I would like to hear, in brief, why you think globalism is bad. I think I know the answer, but I'd like to hear from you directly. Do you find any value in notions like "freedom" and "independence"? "Choice"? "Free will"? If not, by all means do root for the one-world government, 1984/Brave New World mixture of a future with total control over every human being that globalists want. thekitchensink posted... Is it that you are concerned that globalism will lead to a dystopian future in which individuality is stamped out? Is it that you fear globalism will lead to too much concentrated power and too many one-size-fits-all solutions? Yes. The end-goals of globalism are, roughly, the following: - One-world government giving total control in the hands of central bankers and global corporations - Destruction of nations and peoples, mixing all nations into a grey mass, so that nobody feels any duty and loyalty to anyone but the aforementioned masters - Destruction of morality and human values, of the belief in something bigger than the self, of everything that makes us human; replacing all morality with mindless consumerism and hedonism, endless human arrogance, the general belief that humans are gods, that human "science" is almighty and a replacement for God (something a scaringly huge amount of people already literally believe in) In essence, if allowed to reach its logical conclusion, globalism would mean the end of everything good, everything that humanity has worked for millennia to achieve. Gone would be the dreams of sailing the stars. The planet would eventually collapse on itself, and we would die in trash and nuclear waste, because you cannot advance mankind when you have forsaken the belief in something bigger than yourself. thekitchensink posted... It seems like you mostly conceive of the 1% as big tech companies - google, facebook, amazon, etc. I'm curious, what about the agendas of big oil or big pharma? What about large ISPs, who for instance oppose net neutrality? Are they included in the 1%? "The 1%" are not all necessarily globalists. But evidently, most of them - or at least most of the ones in the spotlight - are. Obviously, I don't like any of the multinational corporations. "Big pharma" and the food industry do a huge harm to us in the name of profit... That is completely despicable. But first things first. Once we destroy the ability for central banking and multinational corporations to thrive at the expense of small and mid-size companies, nations and peoples, we'll also take care of the harmful consequences of their unchecked power. --- Blitzball fan? Try Captain Tsubasa II (in English) for NES! *Best game reviews: http://betweenlifeandgames.com* <cite>Vlado posted [p:912603915] in Nationalis... [t:77120852]...</cite> <quote><cite>thekitchensink posted...</cite> <quote>I would like to hear, in brief, why you think globalism is bad. I think I know the answer, but I'd like to hear from you directly.</quote> Do you find any value in notions like "freedom" and "independence"? "Choice"? "Free will"? If not, by all means do root for the one-world government, 1984/Brave New World mixture of a future with total control over every human being that globalists want. <cite>thekitchensink posted...</cite> <quote>Is it that you are concerned that globalism will lead to a dystopian future in which individuality is stamped out? Is it that you fear globalism will lead to too much concentrated power and too many one-size-fits-all solutions?</quote> Yes. The end-goals of globalism are, roughly, the following: - One-world government giving total control in the hands of central bankers and global corporations - Destruction of nations and peoples, mixing all nations into a grey mass, so that nobody feels any duty and loyalty to anyone but the aforementioned masters - Destruction of morality and human values, of the belief in something bigger than the self, of everything that makes us human; replacing all morality with mindless consumerism and hedonism, endless human arrogance, the general belief that humans are gods, that human "science" is almighty and a replacement for God (something a scaringly huge amount of people already literally believe in) In essence, if allowed to reach its logical conclusion, globalism would mean the end of everything good, everything that humanity has worked for millennia to achieve. Gone would be the dreams of sailing the stars. The planet would eventually collapse on itself, and we would die in trash and nuclear waste, because you cannot advance mankind when you have forsaken the belief in something bigger than yourself. <cite>thekitchensink posted...</cite> <quote>It seems like you mostly conceive of the 1% as big tech companies - google, facebook, amazon, etc. I'm curious, what about the agendas of big oil or big pharma? What about large ISPs, who for instance oppose net neutrality? Are they included in the 1%?</quote> "The 1%" are not all necessarily globalists. But evidently, most of them - or at least most of the ones in the spotlight - are. Obviously, I don't like any of the multinational corporations. "Big pharma" and the food industry do a huge harm to us in the name of profit... That is completely despicable. But first things first. Once we destroy the ability for central banking and multinational corporations to thrive at the expense of small and mid-size companies, nations and peoples, we'll also take care of the harmful consequences of their unchecked power. --- Blitzball fan? Try Captain Tsubasa II (in English) for NES! Best game reviews: http://betweenlifeandgames.com</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1