LogFAQs > #912733572

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Ocasio-Cortez says to replace Columbus Day with a holiday for election day
wah_wah_wah 11/20/18 10:27:23 AM #128:	King_Hellebuyck posted... wah_wah_wah posted... Tmaster148 posted... wah_wah_wah posted... Tmaster148 posted... wah_wah_wah posted... "Abolish ICE!"... no one knows what that means. Pretty sure that is very straightforward. Not to anyone who can say the words, "And then what"... what are you saying, really? Just get rid of all immigration agents? Is she funded by human traffickers or something? ICE doesn't work on the border. Also the fact that ICE is relatively new addition. Seems like the issue here is you don't do your homework. I never said anything about their working on the border. Smartphones are relatively new too, that doesn't mean we can just get rid of them and everything will go back to the way it was smoothly as ever. "Abolish ICE" is a slogan without any plan whatsoever, and you'd be a fool to think it's effective to nationalize House races. It's one reason why a slam dunk midterm ended up in such a draw in so many races. Her plan is to restore INS which functions as part of the Department of Justice. Shes stated this literally hundreds of times by now. Its on her website. No need to lie about this. Voters don't read the website. If your plan is to restore INS, then make the slogan "Restore INS"... but she wanted to be a little firebrand about it, and it backfired. She continues to nationalize her office. Nationalizing the office = Republican win. Constituent service = Democrat win. She is very inspired by Bernie, but does nothing that made him so popular in Vermont. She seems to continually enter the arena on Republican terms, which is a loser strategy. <cite>wah_wah_wah posted [p:912733572] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>King_Hellebuyck posted...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote>"Abolish ICE!"... no one knows what that means.</quote> Pretty sure that is very straightforward.</quote> Not to anyone who can say the words, "And then what"... what are you saying, really? Just get rid of all immigration agents? Is she funded by human traffickers or something?</quote> ICE doesn't work on the border. Also the fact that ICE is relatively new addition. Seems like the issue here is you don't do your homework.</quote> I never said anything about their working on the border. Smartphones are relatively new too, that doesn't mean we can just get rid of them and everything will go back to the way it was smoothly as ever. "Abolish ICE" is a slogan without any plan whatsoever, and you'd be a fool to think it's effective to nationalize House races. It's one reason why a slam dunk midterm ended up in such a draw in so many races.</quote> Her plan is to restore INS which functions as part of the Department of Justice. Shes stated this literally hundreds of times by now. Its on her website. No need to lie about this.</quote> Voters don't read the website. If your plan is to restore INS, then make the slogan "Restore INS"... but she wanted to be a little firebrand about it, and it backfired. She continues to nationalize her office. Nationalizing the office = Republican win. Constituent service = Democrat win. She is very inspired by Bernie, but does nothing that made him so popular in Vermont. She seems to continually enter the arena on Republican terms, which is a loser strategy.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1