LogFAQs > #913071527

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Nationalist politics topic 11: NPC meme is the gift that keeps on giving
foolm0r0n 11/26/18 2:11:35 PM #477:	Vlado posted... What part of "Trump getting elected is the most important" didn't you understand? Nothing. What part of the contradiction expressed here don't you understand: Vlado posted... What matters is that the US voted for nationalism Vlado posted... He didn't get anything significant, sadly. You try to reject Bannon's success even though you praise his work in turning the US nationalist. And even today, you're a pawn for his current 3 goals: 1. Let Bannon hide out of the spotlight, absolve him of guilt 2. Broaden the appeal of nationalism in the media (using Breitbart etc) 3. Decouple nationalism from Trump, so someone else can replace him easily Vlado posted... What doubt is there to be had about obvious, natural truths? You were the one telling me that some doubt is healthy. But fine, you have no doubts about what you believe, like I originally said. Next time don't disagree with me if you're just gonna agree again immediately. It's a waste of time. Vlado posted... You do not doubt that the sun rises in the morning and sets in the evening Alaska Now what? You gave an example of an obvious, natural truth, that isn't actually true. There's an undeniable counter example. What do you do now? I am genuinely curious. Do you revise your obvious truth? Do you reject the reality of the counter example? Either option requires you to admit you were wrong, in your path to truth (which is TOTALLY NORMAL AND OKAY btw, everyone does it). Are you able to do that? Do you, in the future, consider that an absolutist statement like that might POSSIBLY have a counter example? --- _foolmo_ 2 + 2 = 4 <cite>foolm0r0n posted [p:913071527] in Nationalis... [t:77120852]...</cite> <quote><cite>Vlado posted...</cite> <quote>What part of "Trump getting elected is the most important" didn't you understand?</quote> Nothing. What part of the contradiction expressed here don't you understand: <cite>Vlado posted...</cite> <quote>What matters is that the US voted for nationalism</quote> <cite>Vlado posted...</cite> <quote>He didn't get anything significant, sadly.</quote> You try to reject Bannon's success even though you praise his work in turning the US nationalist. And even today, you're a pawn for his current 3 goals: 1. Let Bannon hide out of the spotlight, absolve him of guilt 2. Broaden the appeal of nationalism in the media (using Breitbart etc) 3. Decouple nationalism from Trump, so someone else can replace him easily <cite>Vlado posted...</cite> <quote>What doubt is there to be had about obvious, natural truths?</quote> You were the one telling me that some doubt is healthy. But fine, you have no doubts about what you believe, like I originally said. Next time don't disagree with me if you're just gonna agree again immediately. It's a waste of time. <cite>Vlado posted...</cite> <quote>You do not doubt that the sun rises in the morning and sets in the evening</quote> Alaska Now what? You gave an example of an obvious, natural truth, that isn't actually true. There's an undeniable counter example. What do you do now? I am genuinely curious. Do you revise your obvious truth? Do you reject the reality of the counter example? Either option requires you to admit you were wrong, in your path to truth (which is TOTALLY NORMAL AND OKAY btw, everyone does it). Are you able to do that? Do you, in the future, consider that an absolutist statement like that might POSSIBLY have a counter example? --- _foolmo_ 2 + 2 = 4</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1