LogFAQs > #913726020

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicRE3 News
zebatov
12/07/18 3:17:30 PM
#15:


JoanOfArcade posted...
zebatov posted...
JoanOfArcade posted...
REmake was a one for one with qol and other small things re2 remake is a full out remake things will be different in zones and other stuff it uses the re7 engine and looks like it controls like re4

The graphics are far superior in REmake though. It wasn't just a port. The characters are all redone.

Which is why I said it was a one for one remake learn to read

I have no idea what that means. I can read just fine thanks. And with punctuation and grammar like that I don't think that's a fair expectation of people anyway.

RCtheWSBC posted...
Resident Evil on GC was a remake of its original title. Resident Evil Zero on PS4/PC was a remaster of its original title.

REmake 1 and 2 are both built around different engines than their original titles. I think most RE3 fans would prefer a remake of the game than a remaster of the original game.

The version of Zero that came with REmake?

I'm asking because I'm wondering if doing something like what they're doing with REmake2 takes more effort and time than doing what they did with REmake. Or if they're both essentially ground-up remakes of both games.
---
I'm right, as expected.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1