LogFAQs > #913851400

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	SFV will start using in-game ads on 12/11 and penalize players who turn them off
MwarriorHiei 12/09/18 8:52:44 PM #33:	RoboLaserGandhi posted... Makeveli_lives posted... DarkTransient posted... Makeveli_lives posted... Capcom is a top tier developer. Also the post is worded poorly, seems you don't lose money for turning off ads. Instead they'll give you bonus money for keeping ads on. There's literally no difference in meaning between the two statements. Those who disable ads receive less than those who do not, regardless of whether you want to frame that in a pro- or anti-Capcom way. No shit they get less, as they should. As they should. Why should consumers get more content without paying for it in some form? And there certainly is a difference between the two. You allow ads and you get rewarded, you don't and you lose nothing. Losing something you never had is not a loss, yet in your entitled mind it is. It's ridiculous. It depends on if they had those features before or not. If they're receiving less fight money than before the ads were a thing, then they are objectively losing. what do you mean? players still get the same amount of fight money that they got before the ads were a thing. if they decide to opt in to the ads, they get bonus fight money on top of the previous amount of fight money they were getting. so yeah this is a reward, not a penalty. --- http://i.imgtc.com/i/gkielsd.jpg <cite>MwarriorHiei posted [p:913851400] in SFV will s... [t:77286585]...</cite> <quote><cite>RoboLaserGandhi posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Makeveli_lives posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Makeveli_lives posted...</cite> <quote>Capcom is a top tier developer. Also the post is worded poorly, seems you don't lose money for turning off ads. Instead they'll give you bonus money for keeping ads on.</quote> There's literally no difference in meaning between the two statements. Those who disable ads receive less than those who do not, regardless of whether you want to frame that in a pro- or anti-Capcom way.</quote> No shit they get less, as they should. As they should. Why should consumers get more content without paying for it in some form? And there certainly is a difference between the two. You allow ads and you get rewarded, you don't and you lose nothing. Losing something you never had is not a loss, yet in your entitled mind it is. It's ridiculous.</quote> It depends on if they had those features before or not. If they're receiving less fight money than before the ads were a thing, then they are objectively losing.</quote> what do you mean? players still get the same amount of fight money that they got before the ads were a thing. if they decide to opt in to the ads, they get bonus fight money on top of the previous amount of fight money they were getting. so yeah this is a reward, not a penalty. --- http://i.imgtc.com/i/gkielsd.jpg</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1