LogFAQs > #913856432

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	SFV will start using in-game ads on 12/11 and penalize players who turn them off
DarkTransient 12/09/18 10:34:07 PM #48:	Makeveli_lives posted... DarkTransient posted... Makeveli_lives posted... Capcom is a top tier developer. Also the post is worded poorly, seems you don't lose money for turning off ads. Instead they'll give you bonus money for keeping ads on. There's literally no difference in meaning between the two statements. Those who disable ads receive less than those who do not, regardless of whether you want to frame that in a pro- or anti-Capcom way. No shit they get less, as they should. As they should. Why should consumers get more content without paying for it in some form? And there certainly is a difference between the two. You allow ads and you get rewarded, you don't and you lose nothing. Losing something you never had is not a loss, yet in your entitled mind it is. It's ridiculous. Pretty sure anyone playing it has already paid by buying the fucking game. It's one thing to have ads in free games; but in a game you've paid for that's ridiculous. And there is no difference except in the way you word it. It's the exact same lack-of-logic that makes people not realise that positive racism towards one group is just negative racism towards all other groups, just framed in a different way. --- https://imgtc.com/i/0mboxsZ.png <-- Tiamat is best babe, if you disagree you're objectively wrong. https://tinyurl.com/dtlamulana2 <-- La-Mulana 2 LP <cite>DarkTransient posted [p:913856432] in SFV will s... [t:77286585]...</cite> <quote><cite>Makeveli_lives posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Makeveli_lives posted...</cite> <quote>Capcom is a top tier developer. Also the post is worded poorly, seems you don't lose money for turning off ads. Instead they'll give you bonus money for keeping ads on.</quote> There's literally no difference in meaning between the two statements. Those who disable ads receive less than those who do not, regardless of whether you want to frame that in a pro- or anti-Capcom way.</quote> No shit they get less, as they should. As they should. Why should consumers get more content without paying for it in some form? And there certainly is a difference between the two. You allow ads and you get rewarded, you don't and you lose nothing. Losing something you never had is not a loss, yet in your entitled mind it is. It's ridiculous.</quote> Pretty sure anyone playing it has already paid by buying the fucking game. It's one thing to have ads in free games; but in a game you've paid for that's ridiculous. And there is no difference except in the way you word it. It's the exact same lack-of-logic that makes people not realise that positive racism towards one group is just negative racism towards all other groups, just framed in a different way. --- https://imgtc.com/i/0mboxsZ.png <-- Tiamat is best babe, if you disagree you're objectively wrong. https://tinyurl.com/dtlamulana2 <-- La-Mulana 2 LP</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1