LogFAQs > #922047846

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Why are people freaking out over Alabama?
Unbridled9 05/18/19 3:16:44 AM #135:	Yes. As someone is telling them what they can and can't do with their uterus... That's what it seems like. And they also have to change their way of life. Like they shouldn't drink or smoke when pregnant. They have to eat more. And stuff happens to their body. They get sick in the morning, feet swell, and they usually can't work for a while at some point... So, yeah. They are taking away rights to their own body... No. No they aren't. They had the option to use multiple forms of birth control. They had the option to employ things such as condoms. They had the choice to employ other things such as the morning after pill. They had the choice to simply not have sex in the first place. That's an already-abundant amount of rights. Now they are going to kill an unborn life as yet another form of contraception because of their irresponsibility. I'm sorry but I see that as 'the other persons nose' of 'right to swing fist'. I've noticed that there's effectively three different sides to the whole debate. Pro-life (believes in no abortions or extremely limited ones), pro-choice (believes women should have the option in at least some form), and pro-abortion (wants as much access as possible). I am between pro-life and choice myself in that I believe that there are situations which an abortion can, and maybe even should, be done but that none of said situations should be as a contraceptive to safeguard a womans 'right' to act like an irresponsible **. The fact is that two lives are being weighed and a womans 'right to be an irresponsible ' is dwarfed by the babies right to life in my eyes. As such I am highly pro-abortion. --- I am the gentle hand who heals, the happy smile who shields, and the foot that will kick your ! - White Mage <cite>Unbridled9 posted [p:922047846] in Why are pe... [t:77719119]...</cite> <quote>Yes. As someone is telling them what they can and can't do with their uterus... That's what it seems like. And they also have to change their way of life. Like they shouldn't drink or smoke when pregnant. They have to eat more. And stuff happens to their body. They get sick in the morning, feet swell, and they usually can't work for a while at some point... So, yeah. They are taking away rights to their own body... No. No they aren't. They had the option to use multiple forms of birth control. They had the option to employ things such as condoms. They had the choice to employ other things such as the morning after pill. They had the choice to simply not have sex in the first place. That's an already-abundant amount of rights. Now they are going to kill an unborn life as yet another form of contraception because of their irresponsibility. I'm sorry but I see that as 'the other persons nose' of 'right to swing fist'. I've noticed that there's effectively three different sides to the whole debate. Pro-life (believes in no abortions or extremely limited ones), pro-choice (believes women should have the option in at least some form), and pro-abortion (wants as much access as possible). I am between pro-life and choice myself in that I believe that there are situations which an abortion can, and maybe even should, be done but that none of said situations should be as a contraceptive to safeguard a womans 'right' to act like an irresponsible *. The fact is that two lives are being weighed and a womans 'right to be an irresponsible ' is dwarfed by the babies right to life in my eyes. As such I am highly pro-abortion. --- I am the gentle hand who heals, the happy smile who shields, and the foot that will kick your *! - White Mage</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1