LogFAQs > #922164130

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicMen shouldn't be making laws about women's bodies
thanosibe
05/20/19 10:59:31 PM
#291:


PBusted posted...
karlpilkington4 posted...
PBusted posted...
karlpilkington4 posted...
PBusted posted...
karlpilkington4 posted...
_Rinku_ posted...


Try again.


Killing a life should be a crime. It should never be a right. If women want to find some "back alley" and kill a life, they should face the consequences of their actions. Your point is literally moot.


Wrong. In self-defense, defense of another, or euthanasia and pulling the plug on brain dead patients (which fetuses are less than). The president is aiming to pardon war criminals. Everything you post is ignorant garbage.


We're talking about abortion, not self defense. Your last sentence is the text book definition of irony.


Moving the goalposts. You posted a blanket you have no right to end a life statement which is a moronic post typical of you. I also gave you several other examples besides self defense. Well just pile on the definition of irony on the gigantic list of things youre ignorant about.


I didnt move jack. You simply wanted to get a quick win in an argument, and failed because you thought being intentionally obtuse was an actual strategy. All of your examples were awful, specifically the one about self defense. A person on life support who is dying is literally the opposite of a healthy fetus about to be born. And idk what the fuck youre going on about with the president and pardons.


They are all evidence of justified homicide (only scientifically, since homicide is a legal term which defines person, and fetuses dont have personhood), which abortion is one of, against your stupid line of logic that killing should always be a crime. Taking a non-sentient being out of a body of an unconsenting girl is perfectly justifiable in order to uphold bodily autonomy. And weve already established you dont care about the well being of the potential child after its born anyway so saving them from living a squalid unloved life before they actually become a conscious person is actually doing them a favor too.
The president, the leader of the party youre with is aiming to pardon servicemen whove killed people illegally so he proves you wrong too. Youve always been known as the party of hypocrisy though so no one is surprised.
Why do shit posters on this forum always resort to this unsubstantiated claim as to people that are not callous to human life? Its like such a spotlight to their dishonest and unintelligent debate skills.
---
I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1