LogFAQs > #922911002

In an effort to push globalist agenda, some university zealot wrote an article about how the US soldiers in WW2 were rapists and racists. Washington Post published it on D-Day.

It would not be 2019 without at least one woke take about a historical event on the magnitude of D-Day. Enter the Washington Post, which published an article by Cambridge history PhD Ruth Lawlor, decrying the darker underbelly of racial inequality and a militant form of misogyny that accompanied the Normandy landings and the subsequent liberation of western Europe.

Lawlor noted that after the landings complaints of rape began to surface in alarming numbers as Americans pushed inland. By April 1945, Allied Supreme Commander Dwight D. Eisenhower stated that wanton destruction, rape, and other crimes had become widespread in liberated territory.

The historian then brings racism into the mix. According to Lawlor, white US soldiers were frequently let off the hook for raping civilians, escaping punishment on mental health grounds, while black GIs were treated far more severely for their violent and lustful conduct.

https://www.rt.com/usa/461267-dday-rape-washington-post/

Yes, the winners committed many war crimes, just like the losing side. But they won, so those crimes were barely mentioned, while the losers' were exaggerated by war and post-war propaganda. Accidentally, this zealot brings the public closer to the historical truth. That's what happens when the monkeys trained by the globalist elite start acting on their own. They crush their own masters' narrative.

Shame they won't have a huge article about the firebombing of Dresden (pictured here), whose monstrosity drawfs even the atomic bombs... No agenda to push there.
---

Blitzball fan? Try Captain Tsubasa II (in English) for NES!
Best game reviews: http://betweenlifeandgames.com