It's an international site, and the accuracy of its reports is far better than cnn, nyt, wp, etc. It should be on the top page, among the top 3 results, if not the top result.
i highly doubt that, given that RT has as much of a bias (pro-putin) as CNN (pro-establishment dems). i don't believe they're much worse than CNN, bias-wise, but i don't think they're any better, either.
but even assuming you're correct about RT being the most accurate news site, the top result should be the most popular result, not the most accurate result. it's a search engine, not a scientific source. if i google "the universe," i don't expect the top result to be some incredible, peer-reviewed 1000-page scientific study that 5 people have read, even though technically it may be one of the most accurate and best publications on the subject. that simply isn't the way google is meant to be used. the idea that RT should be the top result here in the netherlands (where people are a gazillion times more familiar with CNN) is ridiculous.
To be fair to Vlado, I think his argument (as nonsensical as it is), is that RT is not ALLOWED to become as popular as CNN, due to being sandbagged in terms of how often it shows up as a search result. ---