LogFAQs > #923385218

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Nationalist politics topic 16: Zealots accidentally bring us to historical truth
Vlado 06/16/19 7:27:46 AM #87:	Inviso posted... I said "for political reasons". "We want to combat Russian propaganda" is exactly a political reason. As we all know quite well, the truth serves perfectly as "Russian propaganda" in the last 20-30 years. He never said "false stories" or "inaccurate reporting," as he doesn't want to outright lie and be held liable for it. Inviso posted... you're in no position to make accusations of a globalist conspiracy from Google It was literally funded by CIA and NSA. Google is an arm of the US government, i.e. the deep state, which is controlled by globalists. https://medium.com/insurge-intelligence/how-the-cia-made-google-e836451a959e https://qz.com/1145669/googles-true-origin-partly-lies-in-cia-and-nsa-research-grants-for-mass-surveillance/ Mr Lasastryke posted... but even assuming you're correct about RT being the most accurate news site, the top result should be the most popular result, not the most accurate result. it's a search engine, not a scientific source. if i google "the universe," i don't expect the top result to be some incredible, peer-reviewed 1000-page scientific study that 5 people have read, even though technically it may be one of the most accurate and best publications on the subject. that simply isn't the way google is meant to be used. the idea that RT should be the top result here in the netherlands (where people are a gazillion times more familiar with CNN) is ridiculous. Fair enough. It still should be on the top page. Mr Lasastryke posted... Vlado posted... Meanwhile, facebook getting quite Orwellian orwell must be rolling in his grave over sentences like these. how many times does it need to be repeated that facebook is a private company and that if you don't like it, you're free to use some other social network? orwell was talking about the government being evil, not private companies doing shit that you may not like. Why should it automatically be considered something better if it's not a government that does it? Facebook are more powerful than most countries' governments. Furthermore, the "use another social network" part is idiotic. Yes, switching can be easily done. Bringing over all your contacts can't. You think Orwell wouldn't write the same things about a corporation if something like this had seemed feasible when he lived? --- Blitzball fan? Try Captain Tsubasa II (in English) for NES! *Best game reviews: http://betweenlifeandgames.com* <cite>Vlado posted [p:923385218] in Nationalis... [t:77768351]...</cite> <quote><cite>Inviso posted...</cite> <quote>I said "for political reasons".</quote> "We want to combat Russian propaganda" is exactly a political reason. As we all know quite well, the truth serves perfectly as "Russian propaganda" in the last 20-30 years. He never said "false stories" or "inaccurate reporting," as he doesn't want to outright lie and be held liable for it. <cite>Inviso posted...</cite> <quote>you're in no position to make accusations of a globalist conspiracy from Google</quote> It was literally funded by CIA and NSA. Google is an arm of the US government, i.e. the deep state, which is controlled by globalists. https://medium.com/insurge-intelligence/how-the-cia-made-google-e836451a959e https://qz.com/1145669/googles-true-origin-partly-lies-in-cia-and-nsa-research-grants-for-mass-surveillance/ <cite>Mr Lasastryke posted...</cite> <quote>but even assuming you're correct about RT being the most accurate news site, the top result should be the most popular result, not the most accurate result. it's a search engine, not a scientific source. if i google "the universe," i don't expect the top result to be some incredible, peer-reviewed 1000-page scientific study that 5 people have read, even though technically it may be one of the most accurate and best publications on the subject. that simply isn't the way google is meant to be used. the idea that RT should be the top result here in the netherlands (where people are a gazillion times more familiar with CNN) is ridiculous.</quote> Fair enough. It still should be on the top page. <cite>Mr Lasastryke posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Vlado posted...</cite> <quote>Meanwhile, facebook getting quite Orwellian</quote> orwell must be rolling in his grave over sentences like these. how many times does it need to be repeated that facebook is a private company and that if you don't like it, you're free to use some other social network? orwell was talking about the government being evil, not private companies doing shit that you may not like.</quote> Why should it automatically be considered something better if it's not a government that does it? Facebook are more powerful than most countries' governments. Furthermore, the "use another social network" part is idiotic. Yes, switching can be easily done. Bringing over all your contacts can't. You think Orwell wouldn't write the same things about a corporation if something like this had seemed feasible when he lived? --- Blitzball fan? Try Captain Tsubasa II (in English) for NES! Best game reviews: http://betweenlifeandgames.com</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1