But what I see is Chris going off still about HB. I'm still not sure I understand his original reasoning.
Not to put words in Chris's mouth but Chris's original reasoning is basically as I understand it that HB pulled out Chris's post about Ben as something important, but made no real attempt to do anything with the post himself. He didn't ask Chris about anything, didn't really investigate Ben, didn't really do much of anything with respect to the post so it just sounded like a way to butter Chris up while not really believing the post mattered.
Which is somewhat similar to the source of my suspicion. Mine is more centered on me in that I think that to truly be outraged, and not faking it, when I told red to skip posts, you should've had posts in mind that struck you as important-- which bridges into Chris's point. I also think he's been a bit stubborn in general, more stubborn than a town should be. I feel I'm being tunneled out of desperation because it would look scummy for him to remove the vote at this point-- his argument against me was that I only started contributing content once I had pressure on me (which is clearly not true because I haven't really ever had much pressure on me, and even if single votes were pressure it wasn't his vote that was first) and that I have been largely fluffy (I would say I haven't been mostly fluffy since the first topic because I have actual angles to consider now). His defense of the first was that he did not realize Ulti had voted me when he came to this conclusion, and he hasn't really defended the second. Were the suspicion genuinely from that argument I think a town player would re-evaluate at this point.
Does that all make sense or does none of this really make sense to you either.
I appreciate the summary. I plan to reread this after my kids go to sleep. Bedtime has started. I'm trying very hard to catch up on the current posts before they finish cleaning their room. ---