LogFAQs > #923776829

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Imagine hating teenage girls so much that you STILL hate Robert Pattinson
Broken_Zeus 06/24/19 1:05:58 PM #29:	PK_Spam posted... Theres no other way about it. There are plenty of other ways about it, you just want to troll by pretending that there are none. PK_Spam posted... These people are SO personally victimized about him taking the role of Batman because he was in Twilight over 10 years ago. ...he says while ignoring that Pattinson is getting the role almost exclusively BECAUSE he was in Twilight as recently as SIX years ago. PK_Spam posted... Im seeing comments like he doesnt deserve Batman, or hes not MY Batman He doesn't deserve to be Batman. PK_Spam posted... its like... do you only watch anime and marvel movies? Have you... seen Pattinson in anything since the Twilight franchise? Your personality beginning and ending at flaming actors from a movie that wasnt for your demographic shows... some problems. Okay, let's look at this other film credits since then, shall we? The Rover - $8.5m budget, $3.2m box Maps to the Stars - $13m budget, $4m box Queen of the Desert - $36m budget, $2m box Life - $15m budget, $1.2m box The Childhood of a Leader - $5m budget.... $213k box XD The Lost City of Z Good Time Fear & Shame (short self-directed film) Damsel High Life The Lighthouse Okay, stop trolling, it's obviously from fucking Twilight! Glancing through his filmography, the ONLY blockbuster he's been in has been the Twilight franchise (well, in addition to a supporting role in the Harry Potter films which got him that job -- but no blockbusters since the Twilight films) and most of his films have lost money. There are thousands of indie actors more talented than him -- many of whom are in things that make money -- but he got picked. Why do you think that would be if not for Twilight? PK_Spam posted... Twilight wasnt even the worst thing in the world. Why do we still cling to it like it was the worst thing ever, especially when Batman vs Superman exists? Suicide Squad? BvS and Suicide Squad are both better than Twilight. I_Abibde posted... I'm willing to see what he can do with the role. Can't be any worse than Clooney, right? Even Clooney seems a better choice. And at least B&R was fun. --- Gamefaqs cannot handle my #BrokenBrilliance <cite>Broken_Zeus posted [p:923776829] in Imagine ha... [t:77814990]...</cite> <quote><cite>PK_Spam posted...</cite> <quote>Theres no other way about it.</quote> There are plenty of other ways about it, you just want to troll by pretending that there are none. <cite>PK_Spam posted...</cite> <quote>These people are SO personally victimized about him taking the role of Batman because he was in Twilight over 10 years ago.</quote> ...he says while ignoring that Pattinson is getting the role almost exclusively BECAUSE he was in Twilight as recently as SIX years ago. <cite>PK_Spam posted...</cite> <quote>Im seeing comments like he doesnt deserve Batman, or hes not MY Batman </quote> He doesn't deserve to be Batman. <cite>PK_Spam posted...</cite> <quote> its like... do you only watch anime and marvel movies? Have you... seen Pattinson in anything since the Twilight franchise? Your personality beginning and ending at flaming actors from a movie that wasnt for your demographic shows... some problems.</quote> Okay, let's look at this other film credits since then, shall we? The Rover - $8.5m budget, $3.2m box Maps to the Stars - $13m budget, $4m box Queen of the Desert - $36m budget, $2m box Life - $15m budget, $1.2m box The Childhood of a Leader - $5m budget.... $213k box XD The Lost City of Z Good Time Fear & Shame (short self-directed film) Damsel High Life The Lighthouse Okay, stop trolling, it's obviously from fucking Twilight! Glancing through his filmography, the ONLY blockbuster he's been in has been the Twilight franchise (well, in addition to a supporting role in the Harry Potter films which got him that job -- but no blockbusters since the Twilight films) and most of his films have lost money. There are thousands of indie actors more talented than him -- many of whom are in things that make money -- but he got picked. Why do you think that would be if not for Twilight? <cite>PK_Spam posted...</cite> <quote>Twilight wasnt even the worst thing in the world. Why do we still cling to it like it was the worst thing ever, especially when Batman vs Superman exists? Suicide Squad? </quote> BvS and Suicide Squad are both better than Twilight. <cite>I_Abibde posted...</cite> <quote>I'm willing to see what he can do with the role. Can't be any worse than Clooney, right?</quote> Even Clooney seems a better choice. And at least B&R was fun. --- Gamefaqs cannot handle my #BrokenBrilliance</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1